An article by the Sydney Morning Herald, "Doing the sums - does a private
education add up?" discusses whether parents are getting value for money at
private schools, or if their children would be just as successful and well-rounded at
a much more affordable government school. When parent's consider this choice,
they will often consider a broad number of factors such as the school's location,
accessibility to resources and funding, and of course its recognition as a producer
of high achieving HSC results. The article also considers a fairly controversial topic
on the social environment of a school, whereby parents are considering school
selection by the presence of racial mix. Essentially it is a combination of all these
factors, but it may be debated whether or not it is actually worth paying up to
$30,000 a year at a private school, as opposed to under $1000 at almost every
public school. However, if private schools are giving students an edge in life, then it
must be considered if this is truly an equitable system, as this would simply allow for
a form of social reproduction, where people of higher socio-economic status are
given an even further advantage in life.
Whilst private schools have the benefit of better resources, higher quality teachers
and a further diverse range of extra curricular activities for students, The Board of
Studies HSC results have demonstrated that 9 of the top 10 spots for overall
achievement were filled by selective public schools. However, the top 50 schools
were largely dominated by non-government schools (Better Education HSC School
Ranking, 2012). Therefore, public schools do have the potential to produce higher
results, but these are very specific towards selective schools. A contribution to these
more consistently high results by private schools may be a result of public schools
being rated as more inadequate in imposing discipline, a concern in larger class
sizes and less qualified teachers (Papadikis & Shapiro, 1992). In order to address
this issue, it is essential that an attempt must be made to improve teacher quality in
all public schools, as I believe that, although parents are paying more money for
private education, those students who are unable to make it into selective schools,
and whose families can't afford private education should still be given equal access
to the same level of quality education as those who are at private schools.
Racial mix also appears to be a factor in secondary school choice. UTS university
lecturer Christina Ho (as mentioned in the SMH article) has found a clear pattern of
"cultural polarisation", whereby public schools are "increasingly viewed as ethnic
ghettos" and the fact that a growing number of Australian parents tend to view a
good schooling environment for their children as one where minority groups of the
out-of-school world are also the minority groups within schools. Therefore, many
private schools tend to be more 'white' dominated in many areas of Sydney, which
is evident through Ho's research on language background other than English
(LBOTE). Private schools such as Wenona in Sydney's North Shore only score 5%
in the LBOTE, whilst the public school around the corner, North Sydney Girl's
scored a much higher 93%.
The difference between a public and private education may both have similar, yet
varying outcomes on their students, due to the varying nature of culture, location
and socio-economic status of the dominant groups found within the schools. It is
difficult to determine which option is 'better' for an individual, as it essentially comes
down to a matter of what a parent would like their child to take out of their
education. Although there is not one option which is necessarily better for a student,
I believe there should be equal levels of teacher quality within all schools, and
should be done so in order to increase levels of equity between different schools.
References
Better Education. (2012) Retrieved from the Better Education HSC School Ranking
web site: http://bettereducation.com.au/results/hsc.aspx
Papadikis, E. & Shapiro, P. (1992). Egoism versus altruism? Citizen preferences for
public education in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 27(2), 326-334.
http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/doing-the-sums--does-a-private-education-addup-
20120327-1vw9g.html
Hi~
ReplyDeleteSo this was interesting for me because i went to a private school for primary, then a selective public school for high schools. So i have seen both sides of what you have discussed here. =)
The private school i went to was okay just a bit above average, but the teachers at my high school were pretty amazing, which i believe led my grade to do well in the HSC. My parents were glad that I didn't need to take up so much money in education and still did well. I'm not saying I'm smart, but it was the quality of the education at the selective public that was actually better than my private school.
Jun out~