This
online article (Sydney Morning Herald 2013) sparked my
interest in how migration affects education seeing as over 35million migrants
are young migrants between the ages of 15-24. This suggests the need for the
students to undertake an educational course, secondary or tertiary in their new
country. So how does an influx of international students affect education?
There are several factors that may contribute to an international student’s
success or failure within the educational system of NSW.
Firstly,
the major determining factor would be the language barrier, are the students
coming from background whereby English is taught avidly, especially in NSW
whereby the language main curriculums were taught in is English, LBOTE or ESL
students may experience difficulties keeping up with lexically dense texts.
However, this obstacle is normally targeted by schools in areas of a high
immigrant demographic by offering subjects like ESL for students that have
trouble in the English literacy.
Secondly,
students from another country would most probably have had went through a
different educational curriculum, the older the student, the more immersed and
accustomed they would be to their home country’s curriculum, this may be a
problem for NSW education because now within the classroom, there would be a
greater diversity of students and their content knowledge. Therefore, a major
implication of migration on education would be the push for the NSW curriculum
to accommodate a wider range of students with differences in language and also
background knowledge for subjects such as maths or science. I feel that this
has not been achieved being a migrant student and going to high school in
Sydney, as educators do not completely provide their utmost help and when a
student experiences difficulties in a certain area of a subject that is
relatively “easy” to grasp for other students, the teacher would not want to
hold back the class for the sake of one student, also the possible frustration
the teacher may experience trying to explain a simple concept to a student may
lead to a projection of annoyance toward the student, and students may feel the
same being explained the same thing in the same or different manner and still
not getting it. Most of the time, students tend to tell teachers that they
understand even though they do not.
Therefore,
as we can extrapolate from the above, students from other countries may
experience difficulties in accommodating to the NSW curriculum; this may be a
language barrier, or a disinterest or frustration in the subject. barrier, or a disinterest or frustration in the subject. As
Vygotszki’s model of zone of proximal development illustrates in Mercer et al.
(2011), optimal educational outcomes can be achieved from tasks that challenge
the students and they can understand with some scaffolding from the teacher.
References
1. Sydney
Morning Herald 2013, Nearly 35 million
migrants are under 20, 13 August 2013, Sydney Morning Herald, Australia,
viewed 25 October 2013, <http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/nearly-35-million-migrants-are-under-20-20130813-2rt9k.html>.
2.
Wass, R, Harland, T & Mercer, A 2011
'Scaffolding critical thinking in the zone of proximal development', Higher Education Research & Development,
vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 317- 328.
This is an important issue that should be addressed. I can attest to being awkwardly undermined by a teacher in Primary school when I tried learning Arabic as a secondary language. Often, teachers may indirectly demonize a student who attempts to learn fundamental concepts. I think teachers should be trained with skills to assist students who have these problems.
ReplyDelete